Order on Request to Continue Hearing Petitioner (Employer or collective bargaining Representative): VENTURA COUNTY STAR Respondent: CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY ROBY Filed December 23, 2025 K. Bieker Executive Office and Clerk By: /s/ Erica Martinez, Deputy Superior Court of California Ventura County 800 S. Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 9309 Case Number: 2025CUPT048595 The request to reschedule the court date is granted. Your court date is rescheduled for the day and time listed below. Date: 2/25/2026 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept CR 34 Location : 800 S. Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 9309 Temporary Restraining Order There is no Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in this case until the next court date because: A TRO was not previously granted by the court.   Petition for Workplace Violence Restraining Orders 1. Petitioner (Employer or Collective Bargaining Representative) Name: Ventura County Star is a Employer and is filing this suit on behalf of the employee identified in item 2. Petitioners Address: 771 E. Daily Drive, Suite 300. Camarillo CA 93010 Telephone: 805-437-0222 Email: Makena.huey@vcstar.com 2. Employee Who Suffered Harassment, Violence or Threat of Violence. Makena Marie Huey Female, Age 26 Workplace address: 771 E. Daily Drive, Suite 300. Camarillo CA 93010 Additional employees suffered harassment, violence, or a threat of violence 3. Respondent (Person from Whom Protection is Sought) Christopher Anthony Roby, Age 54 4. Protected Persons Not Listed in 2. Are you asking for protection for any family or household members of the employee or for any other employees at the employee’s workplace or at other workplace of the petitioner? Stacie Galang, Female, Age 52, Supervisor 5. Relationship of Employee and Respondent The respondent is a stranger to the employee; Roby began contacting Huey after reading one of her articles. Respondent is not a current employee of petitioner. 6. Venue Why are you filing in this county? The respondent has caused physical or emotional injury to the petitioner’s employee in this county. 7. Other court cases Has the employee or any of the persons named in 4 been involved in another court case with the respondent Yes: Workplace Violence filing in Los Angeles County, 2024 Case Number 24CHRO02351 There are no restraining order of criminal protective orders in effect relating to the employee or any of the persons in 4. 8. Description of Respondents conduct: Respondent has made a credible threat of violence against the employee by making knowing or willful statements or engaging in a course of conduct that would place a reasonable person in fear for his or her safety of the safety of his or her immediate family. Engaged in a course of conduct that seriously alarmed, annoyed, or harassed the employee and caused the employee substantial emotional distress. ( A course of conduct is more than one act) One or more of these acts: Took place at the employees workplace and can reasonably be construed to be carried out in the future at the employees workplace. Address of workplace: 771 E. Daily Drive, Suite 300. Camarillo CA 93010. The employee was not harmed, there were no guns or weapons used to threaten. The police were involved, an Emergency Protective Order was not received 9. Personal Conduct Orders: I ask the court to order the respondent not to do any of the following things to the employee or to any person to be protected listed in 4: Harass, intimidate, molest, attack, strike, stalk, threaten, assault (sexually or otherwise), hit, abuse, destroy personal property of, or disturb the peace of the person. Commit acts of unlawful violence on or make threats of violence to the person Follow or stalk the person during work hours or to or from the place of work. Contact the person, either directly or indirectly, by any means, including but not limited to, in person, in writing, by public or private mail, by interoffice mail, by email, by text message, by fax, or by other electronic means. Enter the person’s workplace. The respondent will be ordered not to take any action to get the addresses or locations of any protected person unless the court finds good cause not to make the order. 10. Stay-Away Orders I ask the court to order the respondent to stay at least 100 yards away from: The employee The other persons listed in 4 The employee’s workplace The employee’s home The employee’s vehicle. If the court order the respondent to stay from all the places listed above, will he or she still be able to get to his or her home, school or job? Yes 14. No Fee For Filing: I ask that there be no filing fee because the respondent has threatened violence against the employee, or stalked the employee, or acted or spoken in a manner that has placed the employee in reasonable fear of violence. 15. No Fee to Serve Orders: I ask the court to order the sheriff or marshal to serve the respondent with the others for free because this request for orders is based on a credible threat of violence or stalking. 16. Court Costs: I ask the court to order the respondent to pay my court costs.   Dated August 18, 2025 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above and on all attachments is true and correct. Dated August 18, 2025 Ventura County Star, Petitioner Makena Huey, Reporter Pub: Jan 16, 23, 30, Feb 6, 2026